Beware of Pit Bulls in Bed

Tennessee: Pit Bull Accidentally Shoots Its Sleeping Owner

Read the comments, too!

___________________________________________________

A NY City resident, Joseph Garofalo, applied for two licenses to possess and purchase firearms: one for a Premise Residence handgun license; one for a rifle/shotgun license. The New York Police Department (“NYPD”) License Division denied both applications. The rationale for denying him was that Garofalo lacked the needed “good moral character” to have a gun.  He appealed the denials and lost both appeals.

Mr. Garofalo had some issues in that he had previously violated a protective order and been arrested for domestic abuse.  He was never convicted of any crime and he did not disclose any of this on his application.

The NY Police Department denied his permit on the basis that Garofalo did not disclose this negative information on his application.

Garofalo sued NY City claiming that NY City violated his Second and Fourteenth Amendments and that the law is “arbitrary and capricious.”

New York City has settled the case and agreed to pay $10,001 to Garofalo.

Why did NYC settle?  Did NYC believe it would not win the case and that it could destroy the entire law?  NYC doesn’t admit any wrongdoing in the settlement, meaning the law can continue.

It could also have been settled because defending it was more costly than settling.

This might be a good sign that the anti-gun left believes the law on “good moral character” can be overturned.

_______________________________________________________________

You have probably saw or have seen something about the Democrats’ actions during President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress.  It could have been worse.

In Serbia’s parliament, opposition lawmakers unleashed smoke bombs, flares, and tear gas causing three injuries.  (Opposition lawmakers are the Serbian equivalent of Democrats.)

A Few Lawsuits and Things

SCOPE sent an E mail reminding people about the SAFE Act.  A sharp-eyed SCOPE member caught an issue:

The footnotes contained the statement: A shotgun is considered an “assault weapon” if …

It should have said: a   semi-automatic shotgun is considered an assault weapon if…

Oops.  My bad!

F Y I about this case: A Western District of New York federal court made a decision to stop the 7 round limit in a magazine but that did not cover all of NY State. 

But when NY Attorney General Letitia James appealed it to the federal 2nd Circuit and lost, that extended the decision to ALL of NY State since the 2nd Circuit covers ALL of NYS. 

A Circuit Court decision is binding precedent for lower federal district courts in that circuit; they are required to follow it.

Latetia James seems to appeal every negative gun decision but sometimes those appeals bring negative consequences - to her way of thinking.

 _____________________________________________________________

The Concealed Carry Improvement Act (CCIA) has generated so many lawsuits that it is difficult to keep track of them.  Here’s an update on one of them.

The Christian v. James lawsuit challenges CCIA’s banning firearms on all publicly accessible private property without the express consent of the owner.

The Western District of NY delivered judgment against NY State, in January. Western District of New York is a part of the 2nd Circuit Appeals Court.  As usual, New York’s Attorney General Letitia James appealed the decision to the 2nd Circuit because she uses bottomless taxpayers’ pockets to defend the indefensible though multiple layers of appeals.

So, the lawsuit sits waiting to be heard in front of the 2nd Circuit

Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed its answering brief with the federal Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  The brief cites the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen: New York’s ban “…cannot be reconciled with the historic principles underlying the Second Amendment.”

And yes, we are talking about the same Western District and 2nd Circuit that were featured in the first section of this e mail.

_________________________________________________

In 2021 the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a letter labeling parents as ‘domestic terrorists’ subject to the Patriot Act if they speak up about their kids’ education. Attorney General Merrick Garland responded by directing the FBI to get involved?

Local school board issues became a federal case?  Speaking out at a school board meeting made one a domestic terrorist?

Was this just an oddity or a trend in the late and unlamented Biden administration?  Judge by the below.

An anti-terrorism briefing was held at Fort Liberty (Formerly Fort Bragg) where they listed several anti-abortion (Pro-Life) organizations as “terrorist groups.” The organizations labeled as terror groups include National Right to Life and Operation Rescue. These organizations were listed as participating in terrorist activities included opposing Row v Wade, demonstrating and protesting, “Truth Displays,” and picketing. (Forget those pesky 1st Amendment protected rights.)

Whatever position you have on abortion, labelling anti-abortion groups as terrorist groups was government ‘lawfare’ against organizations of which it disapproves.  So, labelling parents speaking out at school board meetings as terrorists was not an aberration in the Biden White House.

If they could have gotten away with this, do you doubt that 2nd Amendment defense organizations would have been next to be labelled terrorists.     

A Few Things

The Arkansas state Senate passed Act 229, (also known as House Bill 1117), which would require public school districts and open-enrollment public charter schools to annually provide students with age appropriate instruction on firearm safety.  The bill would have to also pass the state House of Representatives and be signed by the Governor to become law.

Under the bill, the Arkansas State Game and Fish Commission would work with the Division of Elementary and Secondary Education to create and approve age-appropriate firearm safety courses. 

Although just an option being discussed at this time, the bill does state that if an option of live-fire training is approved, it would require parent’s consent.

As part of the rationale, Representative Scott Richardson said: “All of our children play together and invade whatever home happens to be the play of the day. And in that process, they may go into a neighbor's home and discover that unsecured firearm, and how would they react."

Can you imagine such a bill in New York State?  The liberals running the state Education Department would be peeing their pants!

_______________________________________________________________

HB 2187, passed the West Virginia House Education Committee.  It is next scheduled for the House Judiciary Committee.

HB 2187 authorizes teachers, administrators, or support personnel in elementary or secondary schools to carry concealed firearms and be designated as a school protection officer (SPO).

Yep. Definitely diapers for the NYS Education Department.

__________________________________________________________

In a case involving Pennsylvania’s law banning 18-to-20-year-olds from carrying firearms during a state of emergency, a three-judge panel of the federal Third Circuit had held the ban unconstitutional.  It based its finding on that 18-to-20-years-olds are part of “the people” whom the Second Amendment protects.

The state then petitioned for rehearing en banc where it would have then been reconsidered by all the judges of the Third Circuit, rather than a three-judge panel.

The court denied the petition.  The state remains barred from enforcing the ban and the 3 judge panel decision remains binding precedent in the Third Circuit.

______________________________________________________________

The Federal Third Circuit also denied a petition for a rehearing en banc in Lara v. Paris.

The court determined that the original understanding of the Second Amendment goes from when it was ratified in 1791 and that date controls any Second Amendment analysis.

In order to sneak in and undermine the Bruen guidelines, it has been a common strategy of the anti-gun left to say the understanding of the 2nd Amendment starts with the approval of the 14th Amendment, in 1868.  This would have opened the door for the left to try to use racist, post-Civil War, southern state laws aimed at prohibiting gun ownership of blacks as an historical rationale for current gun control.

That’s right, the anti-gun left tries to use racist laws to justify their gun control positions.

_________________________________________________________________

NICS checks dropped in February but were still over 1 million for the 67th consecutive month.

PLCAA Lawsuit

Last week, SCOPE wrote about a movie about a law suit against gun manufacturers.  That

E mail’s purpose was to point out the propaganda value of movies to the anti-gun left.  Now, there is news about an actual law suit against gun manufacturers.

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a federal law that shields gun makers from frivolous lawsuits when their products are used criminally.  Under PLCAA, if the manufacturer obeyed the laws as to selling the guns and did not falsely advertise, they generally can’t be held liable if the product is used illegally.  However, PLCAA does have exceptions. 

Mexico (the country) filed a lawsuit against major gun manufacturers arguing that gun manufacturers are violating federal law by “aiding and abetting” straw purchasers and criminal gun dealers. The Mexican government claims that these companies “knowingly” sell firearms that end up in cartel hands through straw purchases because American gun makers sell to retailers near the border and some criminals buy those guns illegally and smuggle them to Mexican drug cartels.

The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) recently heard oral arguments in Mexico v. Smith & Wesson. A SCOTUS decision will open - or close - the door on future lawsuits against the firearms industry

SOTUS seemed dubious. Even Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Biden-appointed, died-in-the-wool liberal, who never lets the law stand in the way of her opinion seemed skeptical.

As with many 2nd Amendment cases, there is more here than just winning.  We have to ‘beat the point spread.’   Remember the “Heller” decision which validated gun rights in Washington D.C. but did not apply to the states?  It took the follow up McDonald decision to apply that decision to the states.  Mexico’s lawsuit is in federal court.  A narrow SCOTUS’ ruling might reject Mexico’s federal case but leave the door open for other lawsuits through state courts, which would not ‘beat the point spread.”.

On the other hand, a broad ruling might attempt to stop these lawsuits through the states.  (Emphasis on ‘attempt to stop’ since states like New York have judges that do not let SCOTUS’ decisions stop them from allowing obviously losing law suits in order to tie gun manufacturers up in court and cost the gun manufacturers millions to defend themselves.) 

One thing to remember is that judges often sit on cases of which they do NOT have a sophisticated understanding.  For instance, Justice Kagan made a comment about easily scraped off serial numbers and Justice Sotomayer Sotomayer made comments about manufacturers making easily erasable serial numbers.  They or their law clerks will, hopefully, learn that firearm manufacturers permanent mark serial numbers on firearm’s frames or receivers according to precise ATF regulations, in a way that serial numbers cannot be “easily erased.”  It’s a crime to make a firearm that is not marked (serialized) according to ATF’s regulation and it is a serious crime to obliterate a serial number. Even if erased, there are methods to raise or reveal an obliterated serial

In a moment of sanity, Justice Alito asked if U.S. states could, in return, sue the Mexican government for the flood of fentanyl pouring into American cities?  A great example of unintended consequences.

In any case, no matter what the decision, the anti-gun left will soon be seeking anything they can use to try and subvert the 2nd Amendment.  We can only hope for a broad decision which will make the left’s work a little harder.

Bankruptcy and Bureaucracy

A new legislative session has begun in Albany and the leftist gun grabbers have wasted no time in introducing bills aimed at neutering the 2nd Amendment.  Since there is no chance the 2nd Amendment will be repealed, one of the left’s many strategies is to make getting and keeping a firearm so bureaucratic and expensive that ordinary citizens will give up out of frustration or the lack of money.

The 2nd Amendment is the only constitutionally protected right where one has to get a license and pay a fee in order to exercise that right.

Below are four bills that have recently been introduced which are aimed at burying gun owners in bureaucracy and bankruptcy.  Those starting with ‘A’ are Assembly bills and those starting with ‘S’ are Senate bills.  Where two bill numbers are given, the same bill has been introduced in both the NY Senate and Assembly.

S658 and A4085

No person shall possess a firearm unless such person holds a firearms safety certificate issued pursuant to this section.  To get a firearms safety certificate, one must take: 5 hours of classroom instruction and a test; 2 hours of live fire instruction and a test; demonstrate safe handling on a test.

A fee may be charged for administrative purposes.

Valid for a period of two years, and may be renewed upon completion (again) of all the requirements of this section.

A360

Requires a person to apply for a hunting license prior to the purchase of a shotgun or rifle.

Establishes additional requirements for all firearms, shotguns and rifles including taking a five hours gun safety course and exam, passing a shooting range test with 90% accuracy, providing notarized proof of a passed drug test and mental health evaluation, providing proof of purchase of firearm and ammunition safe storage depositories and passing a criminal background check.

S5813

Commencing July 1st, 2026, an excise tax is imposed upon licensed dealers in firearms, firearms manufacturers, and sellers of ammunition, at the rate of eleven percent of the gross receipts from the retail sale in this state of any firearm, major component of a firearm, or ammunition.

A3376

Requires liability insurance (unnamed amount) for owners of firearms, rifles and shotguns.

SAFE Act Revisited

The New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 is commonly known as the SAFE Act.  It has been twelve years since it became law.  (Did you miss the anniversary on January 15th?)  Perhaps you have forgotten about its provisions which, at that time, caused tremendous controversy – and in many cases, still do.

The SAFE Act passed under the "message of necessity" procedure, a device in the New York State Constitution by which the governor may expedite a vote on a bill, bypassing a usual three-day waiting period. (It was signed into law on the 2nd day of the new legislative session.)  The "message of necessity" procedure was intended for emergencies.

The New York State Senate approved the act on a 43–18 vote on January 14, 2013.  The following day, the New York State Assembly approved the legislation by a 104–43 vote, and Governor Andrew Cuomo signed the bill into law less than one hour later.

Some of its provisions are:

(1)The Act broadened the legal definition of assault weapon to include those semi-automatic rifles, semi-automatic handguns, and semi-automatic shotguns which have one or more features listed in the footnote at the end of this article**. This "one-feature test" was a change from the previous "two-feature test," enacted in New York in 2000, which barred such weapons if they had two or more of the enumerated features. 

A "grandfathering" provision allowing those with an assault weapon (under the newer, broader definition), to keep the weapon, but required that it be registered with the New York State Police.  The constitutionality of the assault-weapon prohibition was upheld by Chief U.S. District Judge William M. Skretny in 2013, and this ruling was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2015.

(2) Beginning on April 15, 2013, only magazines with a capacity of seven rounds could legally be sold in New York

The Act allowed the continued possession of ten-round magazines purchased before that date, but made it illegal to load more than seven rounds of ammunition into a ten-round magazine. 

The magazine provisions were struck down by Judge Skretny in 2013 and this ruling was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2015, allowing New York gun owners to "legally load 10 rounds in a 10-round magazine." 

New York had a pre-existing ten-round magazine limit which remained in effect. 

(3) The Act required ammunition dealers to conduct background for direct or internet ammunition purchases.  Online buyers are required to purchase ammunition through a licensed dealer in the state and obtain the ammunition in person.  The fly-in-the-ointment was that no system existed to do this in 2013.  This provision was enacted in 2024.

(3) New York’s Mental Hygiene Law was amended as of March 16, 2013, to add a new reporting requirement for mental health professionals (physicians, psychologists, registered nurses and licensed clinical social workers). 

Mental health professionals providing treatment services to an individual must make a report to authorities, "if they conclude, using reasonable professional judgment, that the individual is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others." 

The reports (an MHL 9.46 report) are sent to county officials, and if they agree with the assessments, the officials then input the names into the state database where it is retained for five years.

If the person in the database has a gun permit, the license is revoked and gun(s) are seized. The people in the database are barred from obtaining a permit until their names are purged."

Under the health privacy law, HIPAA, because these informational disclosures are required by law, they can be made without the patient's consent.  So, HIPAA protects you from private citizens but not the government.

(4) Owners must report lost or stolen guns and ammunition to authorities.  It is a misdemeanor to fail to report such a loss or theft within 24 hours.

(5) All sellers or other transferors of firearms and ammunition must conduct a NICS check (National Instant Criminal Background Check) of the prospective purchaser or other transferees, in "all sales, exchanges or disposals of firearms, rifles or shotguns" or ammunition, except those between immediate family members,  provided that the transferring family member does not know that the transferee "is prohibited by law from possessing a firearm."

The Act requires that a prospective firearm transferor and transferee process the sale via an FFL, but "does not mandate that FFLs play this processing role."  An FFL, who does elect to provide the service, may not charge the parties more than $10 per transaction.

(6) Gun owners living with a household member "who has been convicted of a felony or domestic violence crime, has been involuntarily committed, or is currently under an order of protection" must "safely store" any guns, using "an appropriate locking device including a trigger lock, a gun safe, or a secure gun cabinet."  Failure to do so was made a misdemeanor.

(7) Holders of handgun permits must re-certify every five years.  In 2022, this was changed to every three years for Concealed Carry (unrestricted) Permits.  

(8) Holders of handgun permit may "request that their application information be made exempt from disclosure under state Freedom of Information Law."

(9) The Act amended New York Penal Law to establish "tougher penalties for those who use illegal guns as well as measures to help combat gang violence."

(10) The SAFE Act contains a severability provision that allows other measures to remain in place in case the broad prohibitions against weapons are invalidated by the courts.

** A pistol is considered an assault weapon if it is semi-automatic, has a detachable magazine, and at least one of:

• a folding or telescoping stock;

• a thumbhole stock;

• a second handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand;

• the capacity to accept an ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;

• a threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer;

• a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned;

• a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded, or

• a semiautomatic version of an automatic rifle, shotgun or firearm.

• a folding or telescoping stock;

• a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;

• a thumbhole stock;

• a second handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand;

• a bayonet mount;

• a flash suppressor;

• a muzzle brake;

• a muzzle compensator;

• a threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor, muzzle brake, or muzzle compensator; and 

• a grenade launcher.

• a folding or telescoping stock;

• a thumbhole stock;

• a second handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand;

• a fixed magazine capacity in excess of seven rounds; or

• an ability to accept a detachable magazine.

A rifle is considered an “assault weapon” if it is semi-automatic, has a detachable magazine, and at least one of:

A shotgun is considered an “assault weapon” if it has at least one of:

• a folding or telescoping stock;

• a thumbhole stock;

• a second handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand;

• a fixed magazine capacity in excess of seven rounds; or

• an ability to accept a detachable magazine.

Andrew Cuomo Might Come Back To Haunt Us  by Bo Rabarsky

Andrew Cuomo was elected Governor of New York in 2010 and then reelected in 2014 and 2018.  Then Governor Andrew Cuomo was the father of the 2013 SAFE Act.  As the 56th governor of New York State, he was, at that time, also the longest serving governor in America, having served 3,887 days in office until he resigned on August 23rd, 2021. 

In 2021 governor Andrew Cuomo decided to - or had to - resign in disgrace rather than face further accusations and a possible investigation into his committing sexual harassment. He also faced intense criticism for the way he handled Covid-19 and the nursing home scandal.

In 2022, he decided not to try a comeback and run for governor against his successor, Governor Kathy Hochul; his poll numbers were very low.

Cuomo’s last New York State financial filing before he resigned (July Periodic, 7/15/21) showed he left with $18,256,818 in his campaign account which could only be used by Andrew Cuomo.

His latest financial filings (January Periodic, 1/14/25) shows Cuomo has $7,709,231 left in his campaign fund. What did he spend $10.5 million on in the past few years?

Cuomo still wanted a political life and decided to spend some of those funds with Bulldog Strategies, a public affairs and consulting company founded and owned by Rich Azzopardi, who was Cuomo's spokesman while he was in office. Cuomo used Bulldog Strategies to help rebuild his image, do polling and now Cuomo wants to run for Mayor of New York City.

In 2024, New York City Mayor Eric Adams was having issues with illegal aliens. Since Eric Adams considered New York City a Sanctuary City, it had been flooded with illegals. The New York State Legislature also provided $2.5 Billion in aid to house and feed illegals. Mayor Adams was on his way to Washington D.C. to see President Biden for even more federal financial aid, when he received a phone call from one of his aids that the FBI was at his office.  A visit from the FBI is generally not a good thing!  Legal problems had begun for NY City Mayor Eric Adams.

A recent poll showed Cuomo leading with 30% of the vote amongst possible NYC mayoral challengers.  Of course, he is currently the benefit of the highest ‘name recognition’ amongst those challengers. Will New York City voters forget the Covid 19 nursing home scandal and the sexual harassment charges?  30% have!

New York State's election laws are a complex set of rules & regulations and will only allow Cuomo to use a small amount from his state campaign funds in the mayoral race. He'll have to go out and raise more funds for his mayoral race.  Meanwhile his millions sit collecting interest. 

Or maybe…

Albany is looking dysfunctional for the 2026 governor’s race.  After assuming the governorship, Kathy Hochul’s first choice for Lieutenant Governor, Brian Benjamin, resigned from office after being indicted on federal bribery and wire fraud charges.  Hochul then appointed Antonio Delgado as Lieutenant Governor.  Now, Delgado has divorced himself from Governor Kathy Hochul.  And with Kathy Hochul’s popularity slightly lower than a communicable disease…

Who knows what the future holds for Democrats in Albany and the governor’s seat. Could Andrew Cuomo use the 2026 New York City mayoral race to get himself back in good graces with Democrats/Progressives and set himself up for another run at governor of the Empire State in 2030? Or will he see a sooner opportunity in 2026 amongst the ashes of Hochul’s governorship?

And remember, he still has $7.7 million he could use in a race for governor.

Movie Review

Some of the most dangerous words in the English language are: “I didn’t really understand it until I saw the movie.”  Movies are not facts!

In 1996, John Grisham wrote a book called Runaway Jury which was about attempts to stack / bribe / threaten a jury in a lawsuit against tobacco manufacturers.

In 2003, a movie of the same title was made about the book with several name celebrities in major roles - but the ‘bad guys’ in the movie were changed to gun manufacturers. 

Rotten Tomatoes’ Critics’ Consensus called it: “An implausible but entertaining legal thriller.”  It was indeed entertaining, highly implausible and, in addition, a propaganda piece for the gun control lobby.

The movie follows a lawsuit where the widow of a man shot and killed by his former co-worker sues the gun manufacturer because the manufacturer made it too easy for a disturbed person to buy a gun. To make that point, a Federal Firearms Licensee (portrayed as a sleaze) is condemned because he lets a ‘straw purchaser’ buy 25 guns a month, month-after-month, and never does anything.  (Apparently, the ATF and the NICS check people were too busy to notice, since none of that is mentioned.) 

Apparently, the murderer walked into an office building in downtown New Orleans with an AR 15 rifle and no one noticed until he started shooting. He must not have taken the bus.  If he drove, was he lucky enough to get a parking space directly in front of the building he shot up?

The heroes and villains are defined unambiguously, with the ‘bad guys’ (gun manufacturers and their lawyer) being unattractive, one-dimensional characters, who all lose their cool, at some point in the film, and blurt out what really despicable people they are.  

And the gun manufacturers contribute millions to the defense team in a scene where they sit around casually drinking whiskey and smoking cigars.  But it’s never revealed who funded the gun control legal team.

On the other hand, home movies are shown of the victim at his child’s birthday party.

The term “Assault weapon” is used often to describe the murder weapon and the gun manufacturer advertises weapons as being ‘fingerprint proof.’  (Can you imagine a real gun manufacturer describing his gun as fingerprint proof?)   

The bad guys are revealed as horrible persons for doing everything they can to subvert the jury and the good guys win - by doing everything they can to subvert the jury. Essentially, the ends justify the means.  Don’t worry about those archaic American principles about right-and-wrong.

Oh wait.  The gun control lawyer believed in right-and-wrong because he chose not to take up the offer to bribe the jury.  But he never bothered to report the bribe to anyone!  That would have been a career threatening legal issue for the lawyer, but if he had reported it the movie would have made even less sense.

And the jury overcomes their initial concerns about the law because they sympathize with the widow, after manipulation by one of the ‘good guys.’

All of the main characters in the film break the law, except for the gun control lawyer and he joins the other main characters in being unethical.  The movies’ “good guys” (gun control enthusiasts) win while breaking the law, but none of those who broke the law are punished. In fact, two of them are made to look like heroes and walk away $15 million richer.  Crime does pay!

So, why this review about a 20 years old movie?

First, the movie just popped up on Netflix, presumably taking advantage of one of its stars, Gene Hackman, just dying.  It will probably be seen by thousands of people.

It is a great example of how the Left sneakily implants their propaganda in the movies and other entertainment forms.

While SCOPE members and just about anyone familiar with the laws surrounding firearm purchases would pick up on the misrepresentations in the movie, people not familiar with the purchase of firearms may swallow this whole.  Fingerprint proof guns being sold?  Sure!  FFL’s selling guns by the dozens to straw purchasers?  Happens all the time!  

At least the murderer didn’t use a “silencer” that went poof! 

Implausible it may be but this is just one of many movies the Hollywood Left uses to push their political agenda.  And the scary thing is that many people will accept it as fact.

Mass Shootings That Weren’t

Criminal use of guns usually makes the headlines.  Defensive use of guns…not so much, as that would justify gun ownership.

The left-wing media concentrates on incidents when guns are used in mass shootings.  What about defensive use of guns that stopped likely mass public shootings?  John Lott has produced a list of concealed handgun permit holders that stopped likely mass shootings, since 2014.  It’s a long list that the main stream media has somehow managed to overlook.  

It is not a list of all defensive gun uses (it’s estimated there are a million defensive gun uses every year) but only those that stopped a likely mass shooting.  It’s probably not all of these incidents since the media doesn’t cover them very well.

 * For more details on all of these incidents, go to the link at the end of this post.

Muncie, Indiana, August 30, 2024

A suspect approached a group of people, waved a gun, and threatened to kill everyone before opening fire. Two witnesses retrieved firearms from their vehicles and shot back, wounding the assailant.

Martinsburg, West Virginia, June 30, 2024

When a godmother realized a man who had confronted her godson in the parking lot of her apartment complex was pulling a gun on him, she came downstairs with a .380 and fired some rounds back at them, which stopped this melee and they took off. 

Statesville, North Carolina, May 25, 2024

A suspect had become angry with his neighbors for playing music and setting off fireworks and decided to fire shots at the group of people that were outside the home. One person returned fire, but no one was seriously injured.

Arlington, Texas, September 28, 2023

A former employee was armed with a rifle and fired multiple shots into a car dealership lobby full of people. When the suspect headed toward the service area, an armed employee told him to leave and they began shooting at each other. The suspect then returned to the parking lot toward his vehicle and was shot in the chest by the police as he pointed the rifle in their direction. 

Las Vegas, Nevada, Friday June 23, 2023

A gunman walked in and fired shots at the front desk. Fortunately, the employee had a concealed handgun permit and was able to quickly stop the attack before anyone else was hurt.

El Paso, Texas, Wednesday, February 15, 2023

A permit holder stopped a shooter who had shot four people and threatened others.

Phoenix, Arizona, Saturday, February 11, 2023

A man was killed after he had entered a restaurant with a gun and fired a number of rounds inside the building.  Another man was inside the restaurant during this incident and shot the individual ending this confrontation. 

Panama City, Florida, January 11, 2023

After being locked out of the business and enraged over lost property, a man got a firearm from his car and began firing into the club occupied by multiple patrons and staff. A patron who is a concealed weapon license holder intervened and fired multiple rounds, striking the suspect at least once.

Tucson, Arizona, December 18, 2022

A suspect was kicked out of the bar because of his disruptive and threatening behavior. He returned shortly after with a rifle and fired a shot into the ceiling. The suspect was shot three times by an armed patron at the bar after he was repeatedly told to put the rifle down but refused.

Chandler, Arizona, December 14, 2022

A man pulled into the employee parking lot of an Amazon facility and opened fire after jumping out of his car.  An armed Amazon worker on the scene saw what was unfolding, and he pulled out his gun and fired at the gunman, wounding him.

Billings, Montana, November 30, 2022

An unruly customer was escorted out of a club.  He then retrieved a handgun from a vehicle and threatened to shoot. Another armed customer outside the restaurant fired the bullet that struck the 35-year-old in the chest.

Detroit, Michigan, August 28, 2022

A gunman killed three people and injured a man and his dog. When an armed bystander saw the shooting, he intervened and stopped the spree killer by drawing his own gun and firing at the gunman until he fled. 

West Palm Beach, Florida, August 7, 2022

A concealed carry permit holder fatally shot a 22-year-old man who brandished a short-barreled shotgun from his car at a family gathering and threatened to fire into the crowd. 

Greenwood, Indiana, July 17, 2022

A heavily armed man had murdered three people and wounded three others when a 22-year-old man legally carrying the gun fatally shot him.

Charleston, West Virginia, May 25, 2022

A man started firing an “AR-15 style firearm” into a crowd. A woman, who was legally carrying a gun, shot and killed him.

South Fulton, Georgia, May 3, 2022

A teenager fired his gun at multiple people. Two men responded by firing back and killing the shooter.

Phenix City, AL, April 13, 2022

After a dispute from earlier in the day, two men returned.  One got out of his vehicle and shot at four people. One of the intended victims with a concealed handgun permit, returned fire, striking both suspects.

Portland, OR, February 19, 2022

A homeowner shot multiple people at a demonstration, killing one woman and injuring several others. A demonstrator, who is licensed to conceal carry a firearm, shot the homeowner.

South Central, Nebraska, October 22, 2021

A fired employee returned to the facility and killed two employees and injured another before another employee shot and killed the gunman.

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, October 17, 2021

A shooting between two teenagers ended when a concealed handgun permit holder intervened,  shooting one of the participants.

Syracuse, NY, August 31, 2021

A property manager saved several lives when he used a legally possessed handgun to fatally wound a man who had opened fire on a crowd.

San Antonio, TX, August 11, 2021

A woman crashed into a parked car and then began shooting indiscriminately as people came out of their homes. An armed resident shot the woman to death.

Fort Meyers, Florida, July 22, 2021

A convicted felon, with an illegally possessed gun, fired multiple shots into a crowd before a bystander with his own gun confronted the attacker. The felon stopped attacking and “threw his gun in a parking lot.”

Chicago, Illinois, July 4th, 2021

Three people standing in an alley were shot before a witness with a concealed carry license shot at the gunman 

Arvada, Colorado, June 21, 2021

A good Samaritan fatally shot a gunman who had just killed a police officer. The Samaritan was mistakenly killed by responding officers.

Fort Smith, Arkansas, May 15, 2021

A man shot an elderly woman in her apartment and then began shooting at people in neighboring apartments. A man used a rifle, not a concealed handgun, to stop the attack.

Metairie, Louisiana, February 20, 2021

After murdering two people and wounding others, armed employees and customers, all with concealed handgun permits, returned fire and eliminated the threat.

Weslaco, Texas, August 17, 2020

A man with an AK47 was planning to shoot people at a Walmart. A customer and security guard held the man at gunpoint and the man put down the gun. The man had another gun on him, which he pulled on police, who returned fire and killed him.

Dallas, Texas, July 25, 2020

Three men were shot and a woman was hit by shrapnel when someone opened fire outside a sports bar.  He was confronted by armed patrons and they exchanged gunfire.  The shooter fled.

Brownsburg, Indiana, July 16, 2020

A 22-year-old man attacked two cemetery workers, killing one.  He shot a third man who was legally armed and shot back, fatally wounding the attacker.

Hummels Wharf, PA, July 11, 2020 

A man killed his ex-wife and another man in the parking lot of a restaurant.  A restaurant customer, who is licensed to carry a firearm, shot and wounded the shooter.

Louisville, KY, June 27, 2020

A man shot a handgun into a park crowd.  Several bystanders returned fire, shooting the assailant in the leg.

Kwethluk, Alaska, May 16, 2020

A 19-year-old man, broke into the village public safety building dressed for combat. He staged rifles inside, and activated the fire alert system and shot at responding officers. A resident armed with a rifle, was able to get the shooter to drop his weapon.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, March 27, 2020

A woman started firing at a group of people who were standing in a parking lot.  An armed citizen shot and killed the assailant.

Near Fort Worth, Texas, December 29, 2019

Three people, including the shooter, were shot in an attack in a church.  The attacker died after being shot by two of the parishioners. Four other parishioners also drew their permitted concealed handguns.

Duncan, Oklahoma, November 18, 2019

A gunman murdered two people in a vehicle before a bystander with a gun confronted him, causing the gunman to turn the gun on himself.

Newnan, Georgia, August 13, 2019

A gunman intended to shoot up a bar when an off-duty employee took a small caliber rifle from his SUV and shouted at the gunman, who opened fire, hitting the employee.  The gunman fled but was later arrested.

Colonial Heights, Tennessee, February 13, 2019

A shooting at a dentist office in Colonial Heights, Tennessee was stopped by a concealed handgun permit holder. After the killer fatally shot his wife, he turned his gun on other people in the office.  A patient shot the killer and kept him covered until police arrived.

Birmingham, Alabama, October 27, 2018

A masked man entered a McDonald’s restaurant and immediately started firing his gun. A concealed handgun permit holder returned firing killing the attacker.

Louisville, Kentucky, Wednesday, October 24, 2018

A white racist murdered two blacks in a Krogers but a white bystander with a concealed carry permit engaged the murderer.  Multiple rounds were fired and no one was injured.  The murderer fled the scene and was later taken into custody.

Titusville, Florida, August 4, 2018

A gunman opened fire at a park full of kids.  The gunman was confronted by a citizen with a concealed weapons permit.  The gunman pointed the firearm at the concerned citizen who shot the gunman.

Tumwater, Washington, June 18, 2018

An attacker carjacked a vehicle, drove to Walmart, stole ammunition and continued shooting at people. He unsuccessfully tried to carjack another vehicle, seriously wounding the driver before two armed customers shot him dead.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Thursday, May 24, 2018

A man shot at people from outside the front door of a restaurant.  An off-duty security guard and another man who was legally open carrying a gun shot and killed the attacker.

San Antonio, Texas, December 7, 2017

A man with a gun was about to start shooting a father’s children as the children were walking out of a restroom.  The father shot and killed the attacker.

Rockledge, Florida, November 17, 2017

A man killed one person and severely wounded another in a parking lot and then continued shooting inside a car repair shop.  Two other workers, both concealed weapons permit holders, engaged in a shootout that left the suspect wounded.

First Baptist Church of Sutherland Spring, Texas, November 5, 2017

A former NRA instructor, who lives next door to a Church where 26 churchgoers were being murdered, grabbed his AR-15-style rifle after hearing the gunfire and went over to investigate. He shot the murderer in the leg and torso before the murderer fled the scene, but was later arrested.

Clearlake Oaks, California, October 23, 2017 

A shooter killed one person and wounded seven in a rampage that started in a neighborhood and continued to two gas stations and a church.  A gas station vendor exchanged fire and a concealed carry church usher eventually held the murderer at gunpoint until police arrived.

Arlington, Texas, May 3, 2017

A man, who had already killed one person, was shooting at the front door of a restaurant as customers were fleeing.  A concealed carry customer, who was dining with his wife, shot and killed the murderer.

Townville Elementary School, September 28, 2016

A 14 years old boy killed his father and then began shooting at a school playground.  One student was killed and three were wounded.  A volunteer firefighter, who possessed a valid firearms permit, restrained the shooter until law enforcement officers arrived.

Lyman, South Carolina, June 30, 2016

A man started to shoot three people in a nightclub.  Permitted concealed handguns were allowed in bars in South Carolina and a permit holder was able to shoot back, wounding the shooter in the leg and stopping him.

Winton, Ohio, Sunday, July 26, 2015

A shooter fired at four different people. A legal concealed carry holder returned fire.  No one was hit and the shooter withdrew.

Conyers, Georgia, Sunday, May 31, 2015

A man came into a liquor store firing a handgun, killing two people.  A customer fired back at the murderer.  The assailant fled but later died. 

New Holland, Wisconsin, May 5th, 2015

A man pulled up to a crowded fire station parking lot full of children and firefighters and began firing in the air and at his vehicle.  He also pointed the firearm at individual firefighters.  Two firefighters who have concealed weapons permits pulled their guns on the gunman who ultimately complied and was disarmed.

Chicago, Illinois, April 19, 2015

An Uber driver with a concealed carry permit pulled a gun and opened fire on a man he saw firing a pistol into a group of people.  The shooting stopped when the assailant was wounded several times.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, March 22, 2015

A man in a barber shop was arguing and took out his gun and opened fire on customers and barbers.  Another man outside heard the gunfire, ran into the shop, took out his own gun and opened fire, striking the assailant in the chest.

Darby, Pennsylvania, July 25, 2014

A convicted felon killed a caseworker during a regularly scheduled appointment.  A doctor in the vicinity had his own gun and returned fire, hitting the murderer three times and critically wounding him.

Chicago, Illinois, July 7, 2014

A man fired on a group of people leaving a party, only to be shot himself by one of the victims, a military service member with a concealed carry permit.

Portland, Oregon, January 11, 2014

A man was ejected from a nightclub, but he returned 30 minutes later with a gun and shot a bouncer and two others.  A second bouncer, a concealed handgun permit holder, fatally shot the assailant.

* UPDATED: Compiling Cases where concealed handgun permit holders
have stopped likely mass public shootings (crimeresearch.org)

THE HOCHUL WALK OF SHAME  by Jim Tuttle

Let’s look at New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s willful failures as well as her intentional and criminal failures. 

Upon taking office Mrs. Hochul pledged the following.  “I do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of New York, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of Governor of the State of New York, according to the best of my abilities.”

The oath is to support and uphold the Constitution of the United States. Since then, she has often conducted herself contrary to this oath. Let’s look at how she has done this.

She has always supported the NYS Safe Act. The Safe Act is not one law but rather a name given for a series of changes to several different NYS laws, over the years.  None of those changes made a weapon safer to operate, or less dangerous. Firearms only become dangerous in the hands of the wrong person. 

In addition, these changes were mostly cosmetic in nature.  Ban it if it has a bayonet mount or a large capacity magazine or looks like a military weapon, and on-and-on.  In direct contrast to the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, these changes were intended to infringe on the civilian ownership of a weapon and not intended to make society safer. 

Later she formulated an enhanced Safe Act, which included “Red Flag” Laws. These are laws having to do with individuals with criminal histories, histories of domestic violence or others that she deemed unfit to own a firearm.  It might sound good but to accomplish this she had to violate the “Due Process” clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendment.

At that time, she also provided NYS taxpayers’ monies to the NYS Police to create a gun owner registration. This was accomplished by requiring the NYS Police to perform background checks (NICS) on anyone purchasing not only a firearm, but any ammunition.  The ammo provision is a delaying tactic (harassment) that could take from two hours to two weeks (or more) to accomplish.  She also created a fee system to put an extra burden upon the ammo purchaser.

Most importantly, she made a very extensive list of places that she deemed that firearms could not be carried: schools or school events; churches; public events; sporting events; private property; and the list goes on.  In reality, all she did was create free fire zones, with a target rich environment. Anyone who wanted to do a lot of damage would have free reign in these areas. As far as I’m concerned, this was an act of criminal negligence. 

Additionally, she further endangered our children by prohibiting the purchase of any type of body armor or bullet proof vest.  Since it has been a serious crime to wear such an item during the commission of a crime for twenty years of more, this was an unnecessary act and only served to endanger citizens. (A further form of citizen disarmament.) Formerly, parents were able to purchase Kevlar lined backpacks for their children.  They can no longer do that.

With these new laws at her disposal, she still has completely failed in her stated goal: “Public safety is my top priority and I won’t rest until everyone is safe and feels safe in New York State”.  Yet, an individual who was very well known to local police, probation officers, family court, criminal court and the New York State Police, and not one entity met their responsibility.  As a result, this person went to Buffalo NY and shot and killed several people.  Kathy Hochul never took responsibility for her incompetence and the failure of all the laws. Instead, she took less than twenty - four hours to blame the tool (weapon) to promote her agenda. (She always uses her failures to promote more gun restrictions).

During the same time that she has continually violated our 2nd amendment rights, she encouraged places like New York City, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse and more, to become sanctuary cities, inviting very dangerous criminals into this state.

A no bail policy was instituted, encouraging these criminals to continue and even escalate in their activities, all in direct violation of the nation’s laws and the laws of NYS. I’ll never understand how a person can be arrested almost forty times and still be on the street.  Apparently, Hochul has no problem with this.

I could go on-and-on about the contract frauds, (which she prevents from being made public,) or the lies connected with solar power - don’t get me started on that subject.

I’ll close and leave you with this thought.  With about five-million-gun owners in this state, more than ever, we need to actively promote our cause, which is the protection of our families and our 2nd Amendment rights - or lose them forever.