Menu
Log in


from our SCOPE membership

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 
  • 04/23/2026 3:42 PM | Anonymous

    Stephen (Steve) Leonard,  Director of Marketing and Communications

    Hello SCOPE members,

    This is Steve Leonard. I’m pleased to introduce myself as the newest member of the SCOPE leadership team.

    I am a lifelong New York State resident, have been married to my wife Lynn for 35 years, and am the proud father of two daughters, Anna and Julia.

    As a SCOPE member in Steuben County, I am re-entering the public arena following an 18-month retirement from an executive role at Siemens Energy.

    On Saturday, April 18th, the SCOPE Board of Directors appointed me as Director of Marketing and Communications. In this volunteer role, I will lead our strategic marketing and communications efforts with one clear goal: turn out more gun owners and Second Amendment supporters to the polls this November.

    You may wonder why I accepted this volunteer position. It’s simple. Governor Kathy Hochul continues to push some of the most extreme anti-second amendment laws in the nation. In addition, her policies — from the costly Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) to cashless bail — are making New York more expensive and less safe. Meanwhile, billions in taxpayer dollars support sanctuary policies that prioritize illegal immigrants over New York citizens.

    It’s time for a change in Albany!

    In the 2022 gubernatorial election, Hochul won by roughly 378,000 votes. Conservative estimates indicate that more than 1.2 million gun owners and 2A supporters stayed home! If slightly more than 30% of them had voted, we would likely have a pro-2A governor in office today.

    To reach far more people ahead of the 2026 election, we will be more heavily leveraging social media tools. In just the last couple of days, I’ve begun posting on the S.C.O.P.E., Inc. Facebook page.

    While we currently have about 3,000 dues-paying members, our Facebook group has nearly 7,500 members. We are looking to significantly expand that number in the coming weeks and months. We will continue to use email for internal SCOPE member communications, but I strongly encourage you to join our Facebook group (if you haven’t already). It’s the fastest way to access timely information and easily share it with family, friends, and neighbors across our great state.

    Our rights aren't disappearing overnight; they are being eroded by a thousand small cuts. We can no longer afford the luxury of apathy. While many gun owners and 2A supporters sit idle, New York is systematically stripping away the freedoms our ancestors fought to secure. It is time to we help motivate those on the sidelines and get them to the polls.

    I’ll close with a final thought…. If we don’t act now to elect leaders this November who will protect our constitutional rights, then when?

    Thank you in advance for your support. I’m looking forward to working with you.

    In Liberty,
    Stephen (Steve) Leonard
    Director of Marketing and Communications
    S.C.O.P.E – Shooters Committee On Political Education

  • 04/22/2026 3:58 PM | Anonymous

    Engaged In The Business  by Tom Reynolds

    In April 2024, President Joe Biden’s ATF broadened the definition of “engaged in the business” of selling guns by adding stricter background check, record-keeping, and licensing requirements. These vague stipulations had the potential to turn private, non-FFL hobbyists, collectors, and occasional gun sellers into accidental criminals, even if they’re not running a gun shop.

    Before the new rule, gun owners could sell firearms from their personal collection without being an FFL, as long as they weren’t doing it mainly to turn a profit through repeated sales. The new rule introduced new factors that created an automatic presumption that one was “in the business,” which put occasional sellers at risk of prosecution.

    The rule would have been a backdoor strategy for universal background checks, a favorite goal of the anti-2A left.

    Texas, along with several other states and firearm organizations sued.  (Texas v ATF). Texas argued the ATF had gone beyond its legal authority, broken basic administrative rules, and destroyed Second Amendment rights protected by the Constitution.

    In June 2024, Texas Federal District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the rule against the plaintiffs.

    Biden’s DOJ appealed to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit but the Fifth Circuit agreed with the judge that Congress clearly meant to protect occasional private gun sales between non-FFL’s, so the preliminary injunction was still alive and in force; the “engaged in business” rule could not be enforced against the plaintiffs in the case.  With the change in administrations in January 2025, it lay dormant.  However, the rule enforcement was still buried in legal procedural fights so ‘dormant’ did not mean ‘dead.’

    On April 16th 2026, the Trump Department of Justice filed a CONSENT MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS APPEAL.  It said, “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), the government respectfully moves to voluntarily dismiss this appeal, with all parties to bear their own costs. Plaintiffs consent to this motion.” 

    Texas and its co-plaintiffs won. The case should close within weeks, barring any unexpected objections. 

    While not covered by this, the ATF should not be enforcing these rules against anyone.  Private sales will be regulated primarily by state law.

    A couple points about this.

    Biden’s ATF followed the usual strategy of the anti-2A left and basically said, “Sue if you have the money.  If not, too bad.”  But Texas had the money and the U.S. Constitution won.  Now, Trump’s DOJ has a section devoted to protecting our 2A rights when states attack our 2A rights.

    Government agencies are formed to regulate businesses not to drive companies out of business.  But the ATF has had an adversarial approach to businesses under – dare I say it – Democrat presidents.  And Republican presidents have not always been rabid about reining in the ATF’s bureaucrats; what Trump called the “Swamp.”  Trump’s ATF seems to be saying, in several cases, that times are changing and it will work with businesses and individuals rather than against them.

    The problem is that buried in the ATF are denizens of the ‘Swamp’ waiting for a new, anti-2A administration to open-the-gates on attacking our 2A rights.  Unless Congress passes laws to protect our rights against these infringements, we’ll be back needing to raise money to fight against our own government.  Of course, we could take the easy road and vote and keep pro-2A politicians in office.  


  • 04/22/2026 10:07 AM | Anonymous

    Massie  by Tom Reynolds

    Testifying before the Senate, Representative Thomas Massie (KY) put out a spot-on defense of the 2nd Amendment when he said, “The simple and direct language of our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. There are no qualifiers on who may keep arms, what types of arms they may keep, or for what purposes.

    Massie added, “The Second Amendment exists for one clear reason: defense. For the defense of one’s home, one’s family, and one’s community, for the defense of liberty and safety, not only from a lone assailant, but from the whole of tyrannical government…Our founders understood the greatest risks to liberty are not always found outside a nation’s borders… but oftentimes from within, when a corrupt and dangerous few grow too ambitious and attempt to subjugate the masses…The Second Amendment is the ultimate check on our governmentWhen we look to our Constitution, remember it’s a document by our people for the purpose of constraining our government, not the other way around.”

    Massie wasn’t just concerned about 2A but the entire Bill of Rights, “Any attack on those core tenets, whether it’s the Second Amendment, the First Amendment, or the Fourth Amendment, or any other provision of our Constitution, is dangerous and wrong.

    Massie didn’t just make a speech. He threw some positive steps on the table:

    Repeal of the Gun-Free School Zones Act which only serves to disarm laws abiding citizens and has no impact on criminal murderers.

    Lower the age to purchase a handgun from a federal firearms licensee (FFL) to 18 from 21.  Massie justified this saying, 18 year-olds “are considered adults and can vote on important public policy issues. They can also form business contracts, get married, and serve in the military. As adults, these Americans should not be deprived of basic constitutional rights.”

    Make Constitutional Carry the law-of-the-land.  “29 states now recognize that the right to keep and bear arms should not require permission from your government to bear those arms.

    Wow!  We could use more Representatives as straight-forward and eloquent as Massie, in defense of 2A. We have a few 2A defenders in New York State, but far too few.  Let’s add a few more this November.


  • 04/20/2026 10:54 AM | Anonymous

    New SCOPE Director of Marketing and Communications!

    Dear SCOPE Members,

    We are pleased to announce an important organizational enhancement designed to amplify our mission of protecting and restoring the Second Amendment (2A) rights of all New Yorkers.

    Effective immediately, Stephen (Steve) Leonard has been appointed as our Director of Marketing

    and Communications. In this role, Steve will lead our strategic marketing and communications efforts to engage, educate, and mobilize our members and 2A supporters across New York State.

    To support this initiative, we are also forming an ad hoc Marketing Communications (MarCom) Team.

    This volunteer-driven team will collaborate with Steve to enhance SCOPE’s visibility and outreach across multiple platforms.

    Roles and Responsibilities:

    • Director of Marketing and Communications: Oversee and enhance our marketing and communications
    • MarCom Team Members: Develop content (articles, graphics, videos), manage social media channels, strategy, including media relations, social media, public messaging, newsletters, advertising, and branding aligned with SCOPE’s mission, support email campaigns, promote events, monitor public discourse on 2A issues, and contribute creative ideas to advance our educational and advocacy efforts.

    Would you like to use your creative skills in support of 2A? Join us. We are actively seeking motivated volunteers

    with skills in writing, graphic design, social media management, photography/video production, public relations, research, legal, or related areas.

    Our goal is to build a creative and collaborative team that can help amplify pro-2A voices and expand our reach and membership across New York State. If you are passionate about defending our 2A rights and want to make a meaningful impact, we encourage you to join us. Please contact Steve Leonard at sleonard7@stny.rr.com with a brief summary of your background, relevant skills, and how you’d like to contribute.

    This new structure reflects our commitment to building a more robust and specialized marketing and communications function while remaining member driven and sponsorship/membership funded.

    These changes will help us grow our statewide network in support of electing leaders who will fiercely defend our constitutional rights.

    On behalf of the SCOPE Board, please join me in welcoming Steve Leonard to our leadership team. We look forward to the energy and expertise he will bring to our defense of the Second Amendment.

    In Liberty,
    John Elwood,  
    President, S.C.O.P.E. – Shooters Committee On Political Education

    www.scopeny2a.org

    www.facebook.com/groups/SCOPE.ny

    Downloadable copy of the announcement in Pdf


  • 04/17/2026 12:22 PM | Anonymous

    Paul Revere  by Tom Reynolds

    The anniversary of the Battle of Lexington and Concord is coming up, which means that Paul revere’s ride will also be celebrated.  Kostya Kennedy’s book “The Ride” gives some interesting insights on Revere and the ride.

    Revere is famous for being a silversmith, but he was also a self-taught dentist!  Personally, if I needed dental work, I’d rather have a dentist who is a self-taught silversmith than a silversmith who is a self-taught dentist.

    Revere had several other rides before the BIG ONE.  He had taken dispatches from Boston to New York City and Philadelphia, which were very long rides. He was reimbursed for his time and expenses on these rides.

    Revere was an accomplished horseman but he did not own a horse.  He rented or borrowed his horses.  The horse he rode on his famous ride was named “Brown Beauty.”

    Longfellow wrote about Revere getting the warning signal by lanterns in the steeple of the Old North Church,

    One if by land and two if by sea

    I on the opposite shore shall be.”

    Not true.  Revere had not crossed the Charles River to the opposite shore when the lanterns were displayed.  He was actually the one who told the lantern man to put two in the steeple.  The lanterns were to alert patriots on the other side of the river who had been warned to keep a look out and what the signal meant

    The lantern man did not hang them but held the lanterns for a very short time.  The fear was that the British soldiers would see them and investigate, since lanterns were not normally put in the steeple. 

    Revere rowed across the Charles River in close proximity to a British ship, the Somerset.  The Somerset was watching for rebels escaping Boston but did not see him.

    William Dawes also rode warning the countryside but he was ignored by Longfellow.  Dawes also worked as a spy and often pretended to be drunk and asleep in a tavern in order to overhear information.

    To get out of Boston, Dawes had to pass a British guardhouse.  To do that, he fell in with some British officers and they rode past the guardhouse without being stopped.     

    Dawes took a southern route and Revere took a northern route which was much the same as the British army would take a few hours later.  Part of the way into the ride, Revere was spotted by a British patrol.  He reversed his path and outran the patrol but ended up taking an even more northern route than planned.

    Revere arrived a half hour before Dawes at Lexington and warned John Hancock and Sam Adams that the British were coming to capture those two.  Then, Revere and Dawes left to alert Concord to move their gunpowder.  (Think about that, the Revolutionary War started because the British were seizing the patriots’ ammunition.  Kathy Hochul is the successor to the Redcoats!)

    Along the way, they met a third patriot, a doctor returning from a house call, and he joined them.  Those three ran into yet another British patrol.  Revere was captured but Dawes and the doctor escaped, although Dawes was thrown from his horse and continued on foot.   

    Revere was questioned along with three patriots that the patrol had previously captured.  The other three were subsequently released and they went on to warn Concord.  But Revere was kept and the British patrol headed back toward the army coming from Boston.  Revere convinced the British that there were hundreds of Minutemen gathering and they would soon be surrounded.  When they heard some shots in the distance, the British set Revere’s horse free and they fled without him.  Revere then walked to the house where Hancock and Adams were now staying.

    Revere finished his famous ride on foot!

    Revere, Hancock, Adams and John Lowell left for a safer place.  Later, they remembered that they had forgotten John Hancock’s trunk full of incriminating documents.  Revere and Lowell went back and got the trunk and carried it through the patriot militia’s lines on Lexington Green, as they were facing off against the British army.  Revere and Lowell had just passed through the lines when they heard “The Shot Heard Round the World.”


  • 04/16/2026 12:50 PM | Anonymous

    They’re Coming After Your (BB) Gun  by Tom Reynolds

    In February and March, proposed bills S09215 and A10701 were introduced in the New York Legislatures.

    The below is taken directly from those bills:

    No person, firm, or corporation shall sell or offer to sell a paint pellet gun or other types of air guns to any person under eighteen years of age.”

    “…the term "other type of air gun" means any implement that expels a missile or projectile by the force of a spring, air, or other non-ignited compressed gas.”

    “…paint pellet gun means a gun, air gun, pistol, rifle, or like device in appearance or function, capable of and designed for discharging and propelling through the air to a target a small quantity of paint enclosed within a pellet or pellet-like device or capsule or capsule-like device that breaks upon impact with the target, overspreading the target with paint.”

    “Any person, firm, or corporation who violates the provisions of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than one thousand dollars for each violation.”

    They’re coming after your BB gun if you are under 18!

    That’s understandable since there have been so many kids committing crimes with BB guns.  The news is just filled with stories about it.  Read them here ____________  here _____________ and here ___________.  I’m sure you just read about the kid who injured three people in Grand Central Station with a BB gun.  Oh wait.  It was a man and he used a machete.  Oh well, close enough.  The important thing to the left is that guns or anything that looks like a gun must be banished.

    SCOPE wants to be sure you have a complete and accurate understanding of issues.  Some articles imply that because of these potential laws, your ‘imitation gun’ will have the barrel plugged.  That is the current law in New York City but not in the rest of the state.*  My non-lawyer reading of the actual bills does not change that; plugged in NY City but not in NY State.  (Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.)

    As I often point out, the anti-2A left cannot revoke 2A so they try to neuter it, in various ways.  The left’s issue here is not about BB guns but about gun culture.  A BB gun or air rifle is the first step in learning about guns in a positive way.  (The left teaches about guns in a negative way.)  Banning BB guns is the first step in breaking what is, for many, a lifelong connection to guns.  But many other people are in the ‘no connection to guns category’ and are easily convinced that all guns are bad.  The anti-gun left hopes that banning BB guns will facilitate moving people from the ‘lifelong connection category’ to the ‘no connection to guns category’.   An early connection helps build a lasting connection based on reality.  If the left can do away with that, the left hopes it will make banning real firearms easier.

    *Per Legalclarity.com: City law requires imitation firearms to meet bright color or transparent material standards similar to state law. Additionally, the barrel of such a toy, excluding water guns, must be closed with the same material as the toy for at least one-half inch from the front end, and the toy must bear a clear manufacturer’s stamp. 


  • 04/15/2026 10:34 AM | Anonymous

    Virginia Is Not For 2A Lovers  by Tom Reynolds

    President Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) has been forming a division to deal with states that threaten our 2nd Amendment rights.  That’s a big deal!  Virginia is one such state and we will now see if the ‘Big Deal’ is the ‘Real Deal’ by putting words into actions.

    Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon sent a letter to Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger (D) which explains the situation: “This letter provides formal notice that the Civil Rights Division will commence litigation in the event the Commonwealth of Virginia enacts certain bills that unconstitutionally limit law-abiding Americans' individual right to bear arms...President Trump issued Executive Order 14206 making clear that this Administration will take affirmative steps to ensure that Second Amendment rights "must not be infringed." 

    Unfortunately, Virginia appears poised to infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens to enjoy and use AR-15 rifles for lawful purposes by making it a crime to purchase and sell them…This Civil Rights Division will seek to enjoin any attempt to infringe the right of law-abiding Virginians to acquire constitutionally protected arms that are possessed by literally tens of millions of Americans.” 

    The General Assembly has forwarded to you over 20 bills that restrict Second Amendment rights. I urge you to reconsider allowing any bill that would infringe on the lawful use of protected firearms by law abiding citizens to become law in an effort to avoid unnecessary litigation.”

    This is probably the first time that the Federal Government has threatened to step in before a bill becomes law and warned a governor that the feds will defend our 2A rights.  The DOJ says it will back up its words with litigation.”

    Over the weekend, Spanberger signed some of the anti-2A laws and sent some back for clarification, (before she will probably sign them.)

    Dhillon said in a separate statement, “I'm hiring up and staffing up in our Second Amendment section…(Spanberger's) a leftist and she doesn't like guns or gun rights. You know, former CIA operative, and so she's all about big government. And so she'll sign that and then we'll end up challenging it.”

    Spanberger was warned and chose to ignore that warning.  We shall see what the DOJ does.  Unlike Obama, Trump means it when he draws a line-in-the-sand.  And unlike private parties needing to have deep financial resources in order to sue a state, the DOJ can match Virginia lawyer for lawyer and dollar for dollar.

    Spanberger says Trump is doing this to distract from higher gas prices. Spanberger’s Democrat Party is proposing a number of tax hikes which will take as much -if not more - money from her citizens than higher gas prices.


  • 04/08/2026 10:32 AM | Anonymous

    National Shooting Sports Foundation versus Letitia James  by Tom Reynolds

    SCOPE has written, often, that anti-gun left wingers know they cannot get the 2nd Amendment repealed so they try end-runs around it.  

    One common end-run is ‘Law through Litigation.’  For example, if the anti-gun left could financially bury the gun industry in lawsuits and litigation, they could shut it down by bringing lawsuits in Democrat controlled states in front of Left-leaning judges.  This could be almost as effective as outright gun ban legislation.        

    To offset the many frivolous lawsuits brought in pursuit of ‘Law through Litigation,’ the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) was passed in 2005 to protect the firearms industry from being destroyed by litigation costs and hostile judgments.  It protects firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable for misuse of their products in situations over which they have no control.  This makes sense since gun manufacturers sell firearms to distributors who then sell to local gun stores.  Gun stores, in turn, sell firearms to the general public in accordance with federal and state laws which include a NICS background check.  If each step followed the law, why should anyone be liable?  For example, if a person in a Ford fires a Colt in a drive-by shooting, should Ford be held responsible?  Of course not.  So, why should Colt be held responsible?  

     But under PLCAA the legal gun industry can be held liable for damages resulting from:

    defective products,

    breach of contract,

    criminal misconduct,

    other actions for which they are directly responsible.

    negligent entrustment if it is found that they had reason to believe that a firearm was intended for use in a crime,

    knowingly violating a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing” of firearms and the “violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought.”  (This is called the predicate exemption.)

    The ‘predicate exemption’ makes the gun industry liable if they violate a state law.  Taking broad advantage of that, states like – dare I say it – New York pass state laws in violation of the PLCAA and then cite the ‘predicate exemption’ to sue gun manufacturers for violating that state law*. 

    Such is the situation in the case of the National Shooting Sports Foundation versus Letitia James (NSSF v. James).  It challenges New York’s General Business Law § 898, which attempts to circumvent PLCAA. § 898 would make gun industry members liable for criminals’ misdeeds, on the theory that they “unreasonably” made, sold or marketed a firearm that was later misused in New York.  Then NY Governor Andrew Cuomo described § 898 as an attempt to “reinstate the public nuisance liability for gun manufacturers” that Congress prohibited in the PLCAA, in order to “right the wrong” that Cuomo believed Congress committed when it enacted that federal law.  [I’m not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that no state can (legally) pass a law to nullify a federal law, when they contradict.  I believe there was a civil war fought about that.] 

    In addition, since almost all guns are transferred through interstate commerce at some point, out-of-state companies are forced to tailor nationwide conduct to satisfy New York’s standards.  Thus, the NY law would seem to violate the Commerce Clause. Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives the power over interstate commerce only to Congress**.

    Then, there is the overlooked issue of the firearms industry being important to law enforcement and national defense.***  In passing PLCAA, Congress found national security implications in efforts to bankrupt the industry.  The industrial base that provides firearms to citizens also equips police and military forces.  (Of course, the same people that want to do away with 2A also want to ‘defund the police’ and they are not wild about our armed forces so they view this as a twofer.)

    The interesting problem is that the Ninth Circuit (covering the West Coast - the U.S.’ most far left circuit) and the D.C. Court of Appeals (equally far left) both ruled that similar laws did not qualify under the PLCAA’s “predicate exemption.”  However – true to form – the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that New York’s law did qualify under PLCAA.  So, the law is currently legal in New York but similar laws are not legal in D.C. and on the ‘Left Coast.’  The case has now been presented to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) asking it to review the case.  When two or more circuits disagree on an issue, SCOTUS is more inclined to take up the case.

    *In a unanimous SCOTUS decision (even Kooky justice Ketanji Brown Jackson agreed) the Supreme Court ruled in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos that PLCAA’s exceptions cannot be read so broadly that they “swallow most of the rule.”

    **In a similar attempt to ignore the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, proposed NY Assembly bill A00929 wishes to allow the NY Attorney General to prosecute people for legal sales made in other states to New York residents that do not go through the NY bureaucracy. A state cannot criminalize an act done in another state where that act was legal.  For example: a dry state cannot punish a legal resident who crossed to a wet state and had a drink there. 

    ***President Trump has spent the past year trying to get things necessary for national security back to being made in the USA.  (Oh wait, the people that don’t like 2A and want to defund the police don’t like Trump, either.) 


  • 04/06/2026 1:14 PM | Anonymous

    A PRIVILEGE OR A RIGHT!  by Bohdan Rabarsky

    If you’ve ever driven across state lines in America, did you think about what would happen if you were stopped for a moving violation or any traffic infraction?  Would your New York State driver’s license be valid? Of course it is!  Even though a driver’s license isn’t a Constitutional right and only a privilege, it’s covered under the United States Constitution.

    How’s that you ask?

    Even though the Founding Father’s couldn’t possibly have envisioned the automobile when they wrote the Constitution over two hundred years ago, crossing state lines is included in Article IV, Section I; “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records and Judicial Proceedings of every other State.” Americans can move freely between states even though they have different, state laws. It would be impractical - almost impossible - for people to obtain a driver’s license for every state they traveled through, so every state recognizes the driver’s licenses of all the other states.  

    If that applies to privileges such as driver’s licenses, shouldn’t it also apply to a Constitutional Right such as the 2nd Amendment? The right to bear arms is in the 2nd Amendment of the U S Constitution, so why isn’t your New York State Concealed Carry Permit valid in the other 49 states? Does New York State reciprocate with the other 49 states in accepting their Concealed Carry Permits? Well, let’s see what the 2nd Amendment Foundation’s Concealed Carry Reciprocity Map says and shows about New York State.

    States that don’t honor any other state’s Conceal Carry permits are: California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island and the District of Columbia. Isn’t it interesting that 6 of the states that were included in the original 13 colonies that broke away from Britain, now deny 2nd Amendment Rights to those entering their state.  And of further irony, New York only agreed to approve the U S Constitution if a Bill of Rights was considered by Congress.

    Since New York doesn’t honor other states’ pistol permits, there are only a few states that honor New York’s Conceal Carry permit: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin. Other states’ regulations vary from state to state.   

    To defeat our own state government’s limitations, many New York State residents obtain Utah and Pennsylvania conceal carry permits, as they’re easy to obtain; you can do the process online and they cover quite a few of the lower 48 states, especially along the east coast.

    Either way, do your due diligence and check out the states you plan on travelling through. Not all of them abide by the Constitution’s Article IV, Section I and recognize another state’s Concealed Carry Permits.  The Second Amendment Foundation is a great source for information.  Handgunlaw.us

    While you are here, take a second and check out this political cartoon which says-it-all.

    A.F. Branco for 3/3/2026 | A.F. Branco | Comics | ArcaMax Publishing


  • 04/03/2026 1:18 PM | Anonymous

    From Breitbart News

    On Thursday, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced his signing of a memorandum ending the blanket gun-free policies on military bases in the United States.

    He made clear that the right to self-defense comes from God rather than government.

    Hegseth noted, “The Second Amendment of our Constitution enshrines the right of all citizens to carry weapons to protect themselves, their families, and their countrymen.” He pointed out that “warfighters” are “no less entitled to keep and bear arms than any other American.”

    Yet, our bases across the country have become “gun-free zones,” he said.

    Hegseth made clear the memo he is signing will ensure that “service members will be able to have their Second Amendment rights on post.”

    The memo signed by Hegseth “directs installation commanders to allow requests for personal protection to carry a privately owned firearm.”

    He said, “Affirming your God-given right to self-protection is what I’m signing today.”


<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 

A 2nd Amendment Defense Organization, defending the rights of New York State gun owners to keep and bear arms!

PO Box 165
East Aurora, NY 14052

SCOPE is a 501(c)4 non-profit organization.

{ Site Design & Development By Motorhead Digital }

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software